![]() You may find this handy in future work with Verilog. Localparam Tu = 10 initial clk = 0 1 always #TU cik = -clk Using the code above as an example, write a code block that will create the periodic waveforms for signals ab.c from the truth table, where the period of each signal is based on a single time variable, like TU in the example above. Notice, the Verilog code below would generate 0 0 1 a clock signal (clk) with a period of 20ns (assuming the default timescale of 1ns) by inverting clk every 10ns. But often we want to test all 0 0 0 input combinations, for example as they would appear in a standard truth table, like the one shown here for inputs a, b, c. You can either use upward references, path them down just as if you had actually instantiated the module in your RTL. If you are binding to all instances of a module, then you do not need an instance specific bind. The previous problem highlights a good method for creating an arbitrary waveform b using an initial procedure with (#) delays as needed. It depends how you want to 'use' the localparams. It would help to show the generate block in your RTL, but I think you are missing an instance name in your bind statement. Click or tap here to enter text.Ī с 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 4. Write the initial procedure that would generate signal d (above) and end the simulation after 12us. Write the timescale directive that would set the unit time to 1us and simulation precision to 0.1us. To test a module you just designed, you need to create a testbench that produces the following waveform for signal d, in time units of 1 us (us, in Verilog syntax). You can look it up in the ModelSim/Questa Reference Manual. ![]() But Modelsim has a vopt switch that global converts all localparam to parameters for the -G option. a b DD с Click or tap here to enter text. Normally the only way to override a localparam is by changing it to a parameter. You do not need to write any procedures (e.g., always), just define inputs, outputs, wires, and instantiations. Assume you have a Verilog project with the following AND and OR gate modules: module MyAND (i, o) input (1:0) i output reg o module MYOR (i, o) input (1:0] i output reg o Write the structural Verilog (that instantiates MyAND and MXOR) for a new module (MyThing) that implements the circuit schematic below with inputs a bes and output y. This includes signed numbers, always, generate statements, multidimensional arrays, localparam. Write an always procedure for a multi-bit rising-edge (clk) triggered register that, behaviorally, defines the following operation: clear the register's vector output (OT) when an active-low reset (rst) occurs, synchronously with clk inverts (logical complement) the output (OT) when control signal (inv) is active high otherwise set the output (OT) equal to the vector data input (IN) Remember: any time you need to execute a block of statements (rather than a single statement), those statements must be within a begin/end block. Verilator supports most Verilog 2001 language features. Problems: Part A -Verilog Verilog will mostly be covered through the DPs, but these problems may help to clear up some common misunderstandings and mistakes. The purpose of conversion is to provide a path into a traditional design flow by using Verilog and VHDL as a back-end. To decide which value to use, consider how the signal should be declared in Verilog after the user-defined code is inserted. If we want to avoid the initial block in module master, we need direct access of the different instances of interface instantiated within the generate for loop. The latter two values specifies how the user-defined Verilog code drives the signal in Verilog. Vbus_mgt_interface.TB_PWR_CONNECT)::set_anonymous($psprintf(,i,i),vbus_mgt_if_array.TB_PWR_CONNECT) Virtual vbus_mgt_interface vbus_mgt_if_array // temp virtual interface arrayįor(genvar i=0 i<`PORT_NUM i=i+1) begin: vbus_connect I'm calling run_test() from initial block of top level module. For example, I have a header pattern to send (localparam header 0xA5A5), I will store this as local parameter and I will assign my databus for defined interval. I have my bench structure where these interfaces are instantiated in a nested module within the top level module. If you're using a parameter, for example, to specify a bus width and you set the parameter to 8, enough resources will be used to implement an 8-bit wide bus. When we set the instantiated interfaces into uvm_config_db# from within the initial block which is inside the generate-for loop, there could be potential race condition between when the run_test() call and these interfaces are set in config_db# because they will be in different initial blocks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |